Door-to-door for Deb Busch

Going door-to-door.  For a political candidate no less.  I first did that last summer.  I played a small role in gathering signatures to get a “No New Tax Party” line established on the ballot for the 2009 town board elections in Rotterdam, NY.  A year ago, I’ll admit that I viewed it with trepidation. What if someone yelled at me?  What if someone slammed the door in my face?  But it was the next logical step in my new-found political activism. Turns out that it wasn’t so bad.  Matter of fact, I even enjoyed it.

Unfortunately I have not been able to dedicate much time to knocking on doors this year.  Until today.  Today I collected signatures for Deborah Busch.  She’s running for New York’s 104th District Assembly seat.  I spent five hours going door-to-door in Guilderland, NY.  I know that the 28 signatures that I collected are going to help a great candidate.  It’s not much, but every signature counts.

I have been impressed by Busch on those occasions where I have seen her speak.  She is intelligent, energetic, and passionate about fixing dysfunctional New York State.  She is new to the political arena.  Last year she garnered 44% of the vote in an election for Albany County Coroner. With minimal help, Busch went door-to-door and shocked the political pundits with the electoral results.  I am impressed that Busch stepped up her 2010 campaign to the state level.

As I told the people I met today, merely electing Busch will save New York State upwards of $90,000 a year.  You see, her incumbent opponent, John J. McEneny, is “double dipping.”  McEneny was able to retire from his legislative “job” at age 65.  He has continued in his current postion, all the while collecting a regular paycheck and a hefty pension.  It is perfectly legal, but I question the ethics of the practice.  For more details check out this 2009 article from the New York Times.

Furthermore, McEneny has served in his current position for about 17 years.  Prior to that he spent much of his career in other public service positions.  In my view, it’s time for McEneny to truly retire.  Who better to replace him than Busch?

You might ask why any of this matters?  After all, most of this blog’s readers do not live in NY’s 104th Assembly District.  In my view it provides examples of how the Ordinary Citizen can make a difference:

  1. Ordinary Citizens, like Busch, can challenge long-time incumbents.
  2. Other Ordinary Citizens can help with the campaigns and truly make a difference.

How are you making a difference politically?  I’d love to hear about it!

Hey Murphy… it’s time for a debate

One of the political races that I’m watching is New York’s 20th Congressional District.  In the interest of full disclosure, I do not live in the district.  A few months ago I volunteered for Patrick Ziegler’s campaign for the Republican nomination.  That nomination went to Chris Gibson, and I firmly believe that Gibson is the best candidate for the job.

Gibson is running against incumbent Scott Murphy.  Murphy officially kicked-off his campaign a few days ago.  At the same time, Gibson welcomed Murphy to the race and challenged him to a series of debates.

I’m hearing through the grapevine, but I have not been able to officially confirm, that Murphy may be too busy to debate, even during the August “Summer District Work Period.” At the same time, I have not seen any significant indication that Murphy has agreed to any debates.  (Please correct me if I’m wrong.)  I sure hope that’s not true.  An informed constituency is vital to the future success of our Republic.

I am fairly confident that I understand Gibson’s views.  But I’d sure like to hear more about him and his positions.  I’m sure his potential constituents want the same.

At the same time, I have to say that Murphy baffles me.  He is painting himself as a fiscally conservative Democrat.  I’m not convinced that his voting record proves that.  (Just a slight understatement.)  He initially voted against the health care reform bill in November 2009.  However, in the midst of intense political pressure, Murphy voted for the bill a few months later.  Around the same time, I wrote a five page paper about Murphy for my grad school “Group Communications & Leadership” class.  I worked hard to take an unbiased perspective on Murphy’s leadership capability.  The paper concluded as follows:

Is Murphy a leader in the manner described by Kouzes and Posner? [authors of a book used in the class]  Clearly, he demonstrates many of the traits, and there are many more positive examples not included within this paper.  If that does not qualify him as a leader, it certainly shows that he has the potential…  However, the perception of inconsistency and indecisiveness during the health care debates begs further question.  It is impossible to determine with complete certainty whether Murphy caved to political pressure and polls, or whether he stuck to the principles that he described… For those taking Murphy at his word, he is a leader.  Doubt exists for those with a more jaded view of the political process…  Only Murphy truly knows that answer.

During the health care debates last year, I will credit Scott Murphy with stepping up to the plate.  He faced his supporters and critics in a number of town hall meetings and other public settings.  Certainly, more so than the -ahem- representative from my district:  Paul Tonko.  (I can only recall one town hall meeting hosted by Tonko… but that’s another story.)  Murphy needs to clarify his views and his inconsistencies to his constituency.

Time to man-up Murphy!  Schedule the debates.

Profiles of the Extraordinary – Al Roney

Al Roney, Ordinary Citizen and talk radio host on Albany’s Talk 1300, could be described as the “Voice of the Albany Tea Party.”  Certainly, it’s an apt description.  He served as MC during three large Tea Party rallies in Albany.  His rallying cry of “Freedom” echoed throughout the city.  (It should be trademarked.)  But it’s not his involvement in the local Tea Party movement alone that makes him extraordinary.  It is much more than that.

Al Roney (right) with Wade Abbott (left) on the air at the Albany Tax Day Tea Party

You see, Al Roney was not an overnight success as a talk radio host.  Al’s career has been and continues to be a journey.  The road map for Al’s life shows more than its fair share of bumps and detours along the way.  Ultimately, it’s one of persistence and self-education.  Allow me to share that journey with you.

Al has childhood ties to the Capital District.  In his joking manner, he often says that he grew up “on the mean streets of Rotterdam [NY].”  (Interesting side note… I live in Rotterdam, and my kids play almost daily in a park that Al often visited during his childhood.)  He also lived in Schenectady.  He attended high school at Christian Brothers Academy and furthered his education at both Hudson Valley Community College and Schenectady County Community College.

His career path took him from a local McDonalds to the US Army with a stint in Colorado.  He moved back to New York for a state job in the mental health field.  Still, he had not found his niche.  After getting frustrated with the state job, Al felt compelled to move into the radio world.  He attended The New School of Radio and Television in Albany.  His radio career started with roles as an overnight DJ and traffic reporter.  He moved to the newsroom and filled-in for other talk show hosts.  The jump to radio was risky.  Al describes himself as very shy when he was younger.  Not exactly a sought-after trait for a talk radio host.

The risks and challenges did not stop there.  Al continually looked for new opportunities.  He took on new roles, learning the basics on the job, often with no more pay and longer hours.  He may have been shy, but it did not deter him from asking his bosses to give him a chance.  They did not regret it.

Eventually, Al found himself hosting the 9 AM to Noon slot on 810 WGY.  His show was immensely popular.  He built an incredibly loyal audience.  How did he accomplish that?  Al brought the perfect mix of local, state, national and international issues to his audience.  More importantly, he listened to his audience.  His talk show was not limited to one-way rants.

Along the way, Al described himself as “not a rally guy.”  However, I believe that he changed his viewpoint because he listened to his audience, and because he got so fed up with government corruption.  Al became more than a mere promoter or participant in rallies.  He became a leader.

Success, right?  Probably, but that’s not the end of the story.  On February 25, 2010 Al hosted his last show on WGY.  Due to the ever-changing nature of the radio industry, Al found himself out of work and replaced by just another nationally syndicated host.  Many of his loyal listeners were devastated.  Some, including this author, rallied outside WGY shortly thereafter.  Large numbers of fans flocked to a “Save Al Roney” Facebook page.  Within just a few days Al’s own page, and the “Save Al Roney” page had more fans than WGY.  Al was overwhelmed and humbled by the support.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Many listeners thought it likely that Al would not return to the Capital District airwaves.  His talent could have taken him to another talk radio market.  Perhaps it will someday, but not for now.  Al reminded his followers that he wanted to stay in the Capital District.  Many of his loyal fans campaigned for another station to bring him onboard.  On June 21, 2010 Al returned to the airwaves for the 2 PM to 6 PM show on Talk 1300 in Albany.  Persistence pays off.

Al is a family man.  His concern for the future that his children will face comes across clearly, both via the airwaves and in person.  He asks the tough questions.  His independent views mean that he will call out corruption whenever he sees it.  He does not blindly follow a party line, as is the tendency of too many nationally syndicated shows.  He challenges his listeners to think critically.  His discussions of local and state issues bring vital news to the area.

Personally, I am proud to know Al.  I have planned two rallies with his help… rallies that would not have seen success without him.  He is the epitome of “what you see is what you get.”  I sat across from him at a McDonalds, interviewing him for this blog, as our kids ran around the play area.  He was there in his typical jeans and t-shirt, just another ordinary guy.  He could be described as patriotic, persistent, freedom-loving, NASCAR fan, self-proclaimed geek, intelligent, thought-provoking, locally concerned, and motivated.

I say that he shows us all what it means to be extraordinary.

Profiles of the Extraordinary is a category within the This Ordinary Citizen blog.  It features Ordinary Citizens who show us what it means to be Extraordinary.  If you know someone who should be profiled, contact the author.

The Ups and Downs of Voting

Every now and then, I need a break from the political rhetoric that I often write about on this blog.

So today, I’m writing about voting!

Wait, don’t run away.  I’m serious.  Your vote counts.  You may be surprised that I’m asking you to vote early and often.  I’m even going to tell you to vote for something on the blue side this year.  (Dang… there go all my Republican friends.)  You see, life has so many ups and downs that it is often compared to a roller coaster.  I guess voting can be like that, too.

Better yet, let’s all vote for a roller coaster.

I’m encouraging my friends to vote to Repair and Reopen the Blue Streak on the Pepsi Refresh Project.  The Blue Streak, located in Conneaut Lake Park, is great ol’ wooden roller coaster built in the 30’s.  Unfortunately, it hasn’t been operating in recent years, and it could use the $50K from Pepsi to restore this historic ride to operational status.  Trust me, as a roller coaster enthusiast who has ridden 327 different roller coasters, the Blue Streak is a great ride.  Check out the pictures below that I took during a visit to Conneaut Lake Park a few years ago.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

There’s only a few days left to vote.

Screaming after this vote is encouraged… as long as it’s on the Blue Streak!

July 2010 TOC Blog Update

Please allow me to provide you with a quick update on the blog.

In five months, this blog has come along fairly well.  It has grown, not rapidly, but steadily.  Overall, I am meeting my goals for the blog.  It is a learning experience, one that has proven quite rewarding.  I look forward to continuing that educational process.

This week in particular has been quite busy for me.  I have seen a recent upsurge in visits to the blog, and I thank you for that.  I am also very excited about what’s in store.  Over the next couple of weeks I intend to wrap up some loose ends.  I realized that I left the “Defining the Ordinary Citizen” series incomplete.  I also did not complete my look-back upon the 2009 Albany Tax Day Tea Party.  I will be completing both of those series of posts.

More importantly, this coming Wednesday (July 28th) heralds the official start of what is arguably the most important feature within this blog. Perhaps my biggest goal for this blog is to highlight and profile Ordinary Citizens who show us what it means to be Extraordinary.  I am sure that many of you will recognize the person I have chosen to lead off this important blog category.  Tune in on Wednesday to find out!

If you have feedback or suggestions for improving the blog, please provide your comments.  It’s all part of the process.  In particular, I would like to recognize my friend and classmate Alicia for all the specific improvements she has suggested.  I encourage you to visit her blog:  No Adult Left Behind.

Again, I thank you for reading and commenting!  I look forward to learning from all of your comments.

Return of the Soda Tax Proposal – Again!

It shouldn’t be a surprise.  After all, we are all too fat because of the soda that we drink.

Never fear, though.  Governor David Paterson has not given up on his quest to raise money, oops… I mean fight obesity. He just called the New York State Legislature back for an “Extraordinary Session.” Check out this post from the State of Politics blog.  It contains a list of agenda items the governor is providing to the legislature.  About halfway down the list you’ll notice the following:

 - An amended version of the so-called “fat tax” on sugary beverages.

It was the term “amended” that caught my eye.  So I clicked on the link embedded in the statement above.  It takes you to the governor’s web site that describes the proposal.  Interestingly, it takes the diet soda vs. regular soda debate a step further.  Not only does this add tax to regular soda, it now removes local and state sales tax from bottled water and diet drinks. Don’t worry, the loss of tax revenue will be covered by the new soda tax. Oh, and you high-calorie coffee and tea drinkers are now on the hook, too. Join us soda drinkers on the naughty list.

Just what we need: an increasingly complex tax code.  Just what we need: more government intrusion.

Bottom line… I’m sick of money grabs and I’m sick of this governor (and government in general) telling me that I am too stupid to manage my own life.  What’s next?  Mandated purchases of treadmills?

Pffffft.  That sound you just heard, well it’s me opening a cold Coke.  Not diet either.  Don’t worry Gov. Paterson, I’ll burn the calories later tonight as I work on my latest landscaping project.

Accusations of Racism – Part 2

Continuing the discussion of racism from Part 1

The first grenade

The NAACP’s accusations of racism within the Tea Party.

The NAACP website urges visitors to “Repudiate racism within the Tea Party” and to sign a pledge.  Another link takes you to a video of “Offensive Tea Party Signs.”  You know what?  I agree, some of them are truly offensive, but others are simply misinterpreted.  It’s also a tiny sample size in comparison to the number of signs brought to tea parties that had absolutely nothing to do with race.

Usually, I just shake my head when the Tea Party movement is accused of being racist.  In my experience, it’s just not true.  Sure, there is criticism of President Obama.  That criticism revolves around policy, not skin color.  As an organizer of two large Tea Party rallies in 2009, I can tell you that the organizers talked at length about perceptions of racism.  At neither rally did I see any signs with racial implications.  Quite simply, if we saw such signs we would not have allowed them at our rallies.  Yes, there were signs critical of politicians.  But they were not based on skin color or ethnicity.

Is the Tea Party movement as a whole racist?  Absolutely not.  Are there individuals with racial insensitivities and prejudices involved in the overall movement.  Probably yes, but only a minuscule minority.  No more than in most other political organizations.  Most likely less.  The same is true for Republicans, Democrats, and I’m just guessing here… perhaps there are even some of that type in groups like the NAACP.  Does that mean those organizations are overtly racist.  No way.  Unlike the NAACP, and many others, I do not run screaming that the racial sky is falling.  Not without significant proof.  Sorry, the video is not significant proof.

The second grenade

Cobleskill, NY – Former Mayor Mark Nadeau and Town Supervisor Tom Murray.

This is another local story that has recently drawn national attention.  In this case, the two town officials were recorded using that nasty racial epithet that starts with the letter “N.”  I know there are many questions about the legality of the recordings, and I believe those questions should be addressed.  Just not on this current blog post.  Has the audio been edited to take the conversations completely out of context?  I haven’t seen any news indicating that yet.  Therefore, I am writing this post with the assumption that both the former mayor and the town supervisor used the n-word in the context reported in the news.

Add to the mix accusations that the mayor engaged in racial discrimination against a town employee.  As a result of the recordings and accusations there exist impressions that racism is running rampant in Cobleskill.  Is that true?  I doubt it.  It is far more likely that the two officials have at a minimum displayed immense racial insensitivity and lousy judgement.

Personally, I am pleased to see that Mr. Nadeau resigned.  I wonder what we will hear from Mr. Murray.  If he does not resign, I suspect the town voters will take care of that in the next election.  Even still, I am not convinced that the damage inflicted should extend to the whole town.

Final thoughts

So, let’s save the shrapnel spewing racial accusation grenades for those times where true racism rears its ugly head.  You know, organizations like the Nazi’s, the KKK, and other despicable groups.  Otherwise, let’s hold individuals accountable and not blame entire groups and organizations.

At the same time, here’s a reminder, especially to our elected leaders:

You have the right to free speech.  But words matter.  Think before you speak.  If you cannot display proper judgement and avoid using racial epithets, then you likely lack the judgement to lead Americans.

What are your thoughts?

Accusations of Racism – Part 1

I’ve rewritten this post at least five times.  The subject is one that can make my blood boil or can result in a sad shake of my head.  I’ve debated whether or not to post it.  I may have missed the opportunity to post this in the most timely fashion… but I have decided to share it.  It’s become long enough that I will post it in two parts.

Racism.  Saying it’s a hot-button topic is an understatement of planetary proportions.  Merriam-Webster Online defines racism as follows:

1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

Wow.  That’s a wide-ranging definition.  Especially for something so contentious.  Here’s my take:  true racism takes place when individuals or organizations step over the line from prejudice to discrimination based upon ethnicity, race, or skin color.  When racial discrimination and race-related violence rear their ugly heads, we need to put a stop to it.  True racism makes my blood boil.  When people voice prejudices based upon skin color, when they use nasty racial epithets… that’s when I find myself disappointed in those individuals.  That’s the sad shake of my head.

Racism played a role during some of the periods of greatest internal strife faced by our country: from the Civil War to Civil Rights.  I believe that undergoing those difficult times has made us a stronger country.  But that doesn’t mean that racism has disappeared entirely in America.  The ugliness still exists.

So, why this post?  Why now?

Accusations of racism become grenades hurled through our political landscape. Racism is an explosive topic. It should be.  Too often, though, somebody unnecessarily pulls the pin and lobs that racial accusation grenade into the open.  Usually, we see it in the political realm.  For the purpose of this blog post, I have examined two recent incidences.  I’m not convinced that my definition of true racism exists in either case, but the grenades are no less damaging.

Get the details in Part 2.

Pranks and Consequences

The Capital District has gotten some national media attention again.  This time, it’s a prank in Bethlehem, NY.  Charges were filed… but not against the pranksters.  Wait… what?

It’s true.  (Check out this article from the Times Union.)  A group of four teenagers were out late last Saturday night.  They chose to bang on Daniel Van Plew’s back door and to ring the front door bell.  Van Plew chased one of them down and tackled him.  Because of the pranksters’ ages, they will not be charged.  However, Van Plew was charged.  From the TU article:

Van Plew was charged with endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor, and second-degree harassment, a violation, and issued appearance tickets.

I tried to think about this situation from both fathers’ perspectives.

Like Van Plew, I am a 37-year-old father of two children living in a suburban neighborhood, (not Bethlehem though).  There have been instances of late-night home invasions in our sleepy neighborhood.  I imagine the same could be true in Bethlehem.  My wife and I have even talked about our game plan in the event of a home invasion or disturbance.  I feel that I can put myself in Van Plew’s shoes.  My reaction might be similar.

However, when it came to the Madeos’ (parents of the prankster) reaction, I’ll admit that I could not completely understand it.  Sure, I have no desire to see my child hurt.  Initially, I might be angry to see that someone else hurt my son.  However, I expect that attitude would change dramatically upon hearing the whole story.  I know that debate is ongoing about whether or not the boy was tackled on Van Plew’s property.  There is no debate that the boy suffered some injuries, but their extent is also in question.  Again, from the TU article:

In addition to cuts on his elbow, a bruise over his eye and a fat lip noted in the police report, Hanson [the Madeos’ attorney]  said the Madeo boy suffered four broken braces. A visit to his orthodontist revealed two loose front teeth and possible root damage from the trauma may cause the teeth to die off and perhaps require root canals and false teeth, she said.

My wife and I hypothetically discussed our reactions if it were our son involved.  The differences would be stark.  Here are some of our thoughts:

  • Even if the injuries were more severe than indicated on the police report, we would not ask that Van Plew be charged.  We would not seek a civil case.  We would not hire a lawyer unless absolutely necessary.
  • If the police charged Van Plew anyway (is that even possible?), we would publicly ask that the charges be dropped.
  • We would be grateful that our son is alive and use this as an opportunity to show him the danger of his actions.  What if the homeowner had been armed?
  • We would remind our son that his injuries were “natural consequences of his actions.”  (That is a concept my father taught me from early on.) We would ensure that he is cared for with the appropriate medical treatment, but there wouldn’t be a whole lot of sympathy over the injuries.
  • There would be other discipline… call it “parental consequences.”  That might include grounding, loss of allowance, loss of most privileges, etc. (By the way, I recognize that the Madeos say they are disciplining their son.)
  • We would require our son to publicly apologize to the community and privately to the Van Plews.
  • As parents, we would share our viewpoints with the parents of the other teenagers involved.

Based upon the facts at hand, here are my minimum recommendations:

Mr. and Mrs. Madeo… It’s time to dump your lawyer and ask the District Attorney to drop the charges.  Don’t even think about a civil suit.

Mr. David Soares (Albany County District Attorney)… Drop the charges whether or not the Madeos request it.

Mr. Van Plew… I urge you to not to escalate the situation any further, especially if the charges are dropped.  Take the high ground.  My guess is that you’ll have plenty of community support, maybe even legal and financial, should you need it.

What do you think?

————————-

7/24/10 Update:  Looks like David Soares will drop the charges.  Good decision.  Check out this article from the Times Union.  Is anybody surprised that the Madeos’ attorney “reacted with indignation” according to the article?

A Tea Party “Must-Read”

So, what exactly is a “Tea Partier?” I consider myself one, and I’m not sure that I can adequately answer the question. Certainly, the national media, and probably most Americans struggle to define the Tea Party movement.

I hope this blog offers insight into the Tea Party movement and my involvement. Yet, it is a fairly narrow perspective… mostly mine.   I encourage you to learn more about the movement as a whole.

Let me provide you with another resource to broaden your Tea Party perspective.

I had the opportunity a couple months ago to sit down with a local television reporter to answer that initial question and many others about the Tea Party movement. Steve Ference challenged me to provide my opinions about the Tea Party movement, and he asked me to provide background on what motivated me to get involved.

Steve has just published a book called Voices of the Tea Party. I am honored and humbled that one of the seven perspectives in the book is mine.  I am grateful to Steve for taking the time to listen to me and print my viewpoints.

It’s a book that can be easily read in a single sitting or in separate sessions. I enjoyed it thoroughly.  Not because it contained my opinions, but because it provided a diverse selection of Tea Partier opinions.  Being the good journalist, Steve did not pull any punches with his questions either. Among other topics, the book covers accusations of racism, conspiracy theories, and fractures within the movement.  I can almost guarantee that you will not agree with all of the perspectives provided in the book.  More importantly, though, it provides a framework that encourages critical thinking.

I urge you to check it out, especially if you are not familiar with the Tea Party movement.

The book is currently available on Lulu.com.  Steve expects it to become available at Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com in another month or so.

Happy reading!

  • Welcome!

    I believe that we desperately need to hear the stories of Ordinary Citizens who make a difference in our lives, our communities and our world.

    Why not be Ordinary?

    Why not make a difference?

    Why not be Ordinary AND make a difference?

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 605 other subscribers
  • Calendar

    July 2010
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031